Today, a new Conservative Government has been elected and many service users have been reaching out to us asking what this means for the future of trans and non-binary children and young people.

As with any new Government, we see this as a fresh opportunity to work towards a better world for our service users. 

Reform of the Gender Recognition Act is, of course, a major priority for us over the course of this term. We must ensure the reform process launched by the previous Conservative Party leader, Theresa May in 2018, is honoured and completed under Johnson’s Government in a way that recognises all trans and non-binary people, including children and young people. A large number of us gave them our time and our trust and now it is time to make positive change. 

During the election campaign, Mermaids wrote to each major political party to ask them to remember trans and non-binary young people in their manifestos and we repeat here what we made clear then:

We are ready and welcome an opportunity to discuss GRA reform as well as other issues impacting young trans and non-binary people today including healthcare, education and criminal justice. 

We will be contacting the new Minister for Women and Equalities once they are appointed and we look forward to working with them during the next term to Get Trans Equality Done

Our team will carry on working with policy makers to ensure the Gender Recognition Act supports all those who need it. We will work with the NHS to ensure everyone has access to the care they need. We will continue to work in education so that every child and young person is supported, whether they are cisgender, trans, non-binary or gender questioning. Every child deserves this. We won’t stop until we’ve achieved acceptance without exception for all trans and non-binary people.

We are as resolute as ever in our mission to Embrace, Empower and Educate.

For anyone in need of our support, our helpline is open Monday to Friday 9am – 9pm. 

We’re proud to have launched our powerful crowdfunder campaign, “If I Had A Voice”, sending the plea to journalists, broadcasters and social media campaigners: “If you haven’t listened to transgender kids, don’t speak about them”.

Corpus Linguistics research carried out exclusively for Mermaids by Professor Paul Baker of Lancaster University found that*: 

 – The British press has increased its coverage of stories about trans people over the last 6 years writing roughly three and a half times as many articles in 2018-19 compared to 2012.

 – Mentions of transgender children are 23 times as common in 2018-19 compared to 2012. 

 – An analysis of 100 random cases in 2018-9 found 56 cases where transgender children were described as existing and/or requiring support. Thirty seven cases were more disapproving, either suggesting that children who identify as trans should not be supported in transitioning or that efforts to support them are unnecessary. A further seven cases appear more neutral.

 – Trans(gender) people generally are increasingly written about in negative ways. They are described as having a propensity to be offended or be involved in conflicts or trouble in 586 cases in 2018-19 (compared to 8 times in 2012). They are described in the context of being demanding or aggressive 334 times in 2018-19 (compared to 5 times in 2012). And they are described in the context of crime (either as criminals or victims of crime) 608 times in 2018-19, as opposed to 3 times in 2012. 

 – There were no references to the trans(gender) lobby in 2012. In contrast, 2018-19 saw 151 mentions of this term, with over 90% of such cases writing about it in a negative way (e.g. as silencing debate, peddling politically-correct fallacies, being deranged or aggressively militant).  

Mermaids CEO, Susie Green said: “Over the last few years, we’ve seen an explosion in media stories relating to children and gender issues and, while some of it has been responsible and understanding, much has been misleading, ill-informed and even, at times, cruel. One consistent issue we’ve found is that politicians, presenters, campaigners and influencers are eager to speak about trans and gender-questioning children without listening to them first. 

“Today, we’re making a fresh plea to everyone involved in the important and complex debate around gender issues, to stop for a moment and think about the impact their articles, broadcasts and social media posts have on real kids living real lives.

“This new research from Professor Paul Baker just goes to show we still have a long way to go before transgender young people get the fair and free voice they deserve in the media and online.”

The film, which was made to accompany the campaign and research features 11-year-old transgender girl from Liverpool, Emily trying to speak against an unrelenting tide of negative press and online speculation. She says: 

“I am very proud of who I am. I have spent my whole life fighting to be heard and understood by family, friends, doctors, school teachers and even strangers. Some listen to me and some don’t. Some take a while to understand and some never have. I know that there is a good chance I will have to fight my entire life to be heard. 

“I feel like people don’t think I need to be heard, because I am a child and they think that I don’t know about myself, but I do. I know me better than anybody. I know that I am talked about by important people and they all have opinions of me and my family even though they don’t know us. I know that they talk about me in a bad way that I am someone to be frightened of or that I will do bad things. But the people that know me and talk to me really like me. 

“I know that I am a good person and I really care about other people. I have set up an LGBT club at my new secondary school because I noticed that there were other kids struggling to be who they are and I wanted them to know people that understand how it feels. I took part in this short film because when I heard about it I felt like someone had read my mind. This short film explains exactly how I feel. Thank you very much for listening. It makes me feel happy.” 

Please take some time to read the research below. This research is ongoing and we look forward to adding more detail as we find it.

Comparison of the coverage of stories about trans people in 2012 and 2018-19

Professor Paul Baker, Lancaster University

The British press has increased its coverage of stories about trans people over the last 6 years writing roughly three and a half times as many articles in 2018-19 compared to 2012. While all newspapers wrote more articles, this is most marked in The Guardian and Mirror.

Mentions of trans(gender) children are 23 times as common in 2018-19 compared to 2012. An analysis of 100 random cases in 2018-9 found 56 cases where transgender children were described as existing and/or requiring support. Thirty seven cases were more disapproving, either suggesting that children who identify as trans should not be supported in transitioning or that efforts to support them (e.g. through pronoun stickers or gender-neutral toilets) are unnecessary. A further seven cases appear more neutral, noting that this is an issue which divides people but not clearly coming down on either side.

Trans(gender) people are increasingly written about in negative ways. They are described as having a propensity to be offended or be involved in conflicts or trouble in 586 cases in 2018-19 (compared to 8 times in 2012). They are described in the context of being demanding or aggressive 334 times in 2018-19 (compared to 5 times in 2012). And they are described in the context of crime (either as criminals or victims of crime) 608 times in 2018-19, as opposed to 3 times in 2012. There were no references to the trans(gender) lobby in 2012. In contrast, 2018-19 saw 151 mentions of this term, with over 90% of such cases writing about it in a negative way (e.g. as silencing debate, peddling politically-correct fallacies, being deranged or aggressively militant). The transgender lobby is described as unimportant, using terms like miniscule and doomed, yet at other times it is described as powerfulhegemonic and influential.

Terminology around trans people has shifted – in 2012 the most common term was transgender, which was three times as common as trans. Now, both terms are around equally common, although only the Guardian and the Observer prefer trans overall. Terms like transsexualtransvestite and sex-change have decreased over time although are still notable in the British press – these four terms occurred collectively 981 times in the last two years (at least once a day). Transsexual people are often described as exotic figures of entertainment, either fictional characters in films or soap operas or as people on reality television. The most common job assigned to them is sex-worker. Tranny is about half as popular in 2018-9 as it was in 2012 and is only now used in stories that describe the label as a form of bullying. However, in 2012 such people were mockingly described as having poor style, as freakish or involved in sex scandals.

However, the word transgender and its plural occurs as a noun 37 times in the press in 2018-19 (e.g. “NHS guidance about transgenders has now been slammed”). Like calling someone “a gay” or “a black”, this practice could be seen as reductive as it labels a person by a single quality, rather than representing them in a way that implies they can have other characteristics. It is most commonly found in the Express and is a practice which has increased from 2012, where only one case was found.

In 2012 the press wrote much more about clothing choices of trans people and their ability to “pass” as a particular gender, as well as operations or implants. More recently, newer concepts have been introduced into stories about trans people – transitioning, gender fluidity, inclusivity, cis people or issues around language use such as gender neutral pronouns or access to gender neutral toilets. References to transphobia are 112 times more common in 2018-19 compared to 2012. Many of these stories appear as a result of the increased coverage in the Guardian, however, the framing of such topics does not always present a sympathetic picture across the whole press. A random sample of 100 references to transphobia and related terms like transphobe found approximately half of them (47%) raised questions about the validity of the concept or whether something actually really was transphobic. The press indicated suspicion of the term by placing it in distancing scare quotes 15% of the time it appeared, as well as using language like “supposed transphobia” or simply reporting that a claim about transphobia was incorrect e.g. “Legitimate objections from women have been howled down as transphobic”.

In conclusion, the UK press wrote over 6,000 articles about trans people in 2018-19. On the surface there appear to have been improvements – some of the more inappropriate and joking uses of language around trans people have reduced since 2012 and there are many more stories around transphobia and inclusivity. However, there are large swathes of the press which write about these topics in order to be critical of trans people and many articles which paint trans people as unreasonable and aggressive. The picture suggests that the conservative press and most of the tabloids have shifted from an openly hostile and ridiculing stance on trans people towards carefully worded but still very negative stance. 

Sun +Sunday Sun13143,761913354,067
Telegraph +Sunday Telegraph12398,572813554,216
Mail + Mail on Sunday7883,154585491,621
Mirror +Sunday Mirror4418,632425190,160
Observer44 2012 articles48,104 2012words179 2018/19articles254,523 2018/19words

*21 October 2017 – 21 October 2019

The I was not in print in 2012, while The Star was not available from Nexis in 2019, while the Independent is no longer a print newspaper. The much larger size of the data in The Guardian is partially due to the way Nexis archives Guardian articles (sometimes by truncating numerous articles into 30,000 word texts). The data is therefore not perfectly comparable, and we also need to take into account the 2nd collection period is twice as long as the first. The larger amount of data in 2018-9 will likely mean that many words will simply be more frequent than they used to be, so it is useful to consider proportional frequencies as well. Additionally, we need to bear in mind the disproportionate influence of The Guardian on the second dataset (47% of all words in 2018-9, compared to 14% in 2012). When considering frequencies overall, the perspective of the Guardian will skew the data much more in 2018-9 – thus we should expect the 2018-19 data to contain more “left-leaning” perspectives on trans people than before.

There were roughly 3 and a half times as many articles about trans people in the 2018-2019 period compared to 2012. While all newspapers are writing about trans people more, The Guardian and Mirror have increased their coverage the most dramatically, The Express and The Observer the least. 

2018 figures

sex change1923991273353841286
cross dress*13572234312491036245
she male0010000001
gender queer0400000239

In 2012, the most commonly used term, transgender was three times as common as trans. By 2018-19 the two terms are of similar frequency

Trans and transgender are the most common terms used to refer to trans people in 2018-19. The two terms are of similar frequency. The Guardian and Observer show a strong preference for trans (using it twice as much as transgender) in 2018-9. The I uses both terms about equally while the other newspapers all prefer transgender.

In 2018-9 the press used the term sex-change 410 times – about once every other day, with three newspapers accounting for around 2/3 of uses (The Mail 33%, The Times 17% and The Telegraph 11%).

Child sex-change charity handed £500,000 by national lottery; An ‘aggressive’ group that says under-16s should be allowed to alter their bodies medically plans to go nationwide. (Sunday Times December 16th 2018.)


The word transsexual and its plural were used 317 times – about once every other day, again with the Times (26%), Telegraph (18%) and Mail (18%) accounting for almost 2/3 of cases. Transsexual people are frequently represented as exotic figures of entertainment, either fictional characters in films or soap operas or people in reality tv.

It’s got a real cast of lively characters and bigger than life characters. Jason Fleming plays a transsexual in it, he’s brilliant and flamboyant. (The Times, 19 February 2018)

The most common job assigned to transsexual people is sex-worker/prostitute.

Terror teacher Umar Haque searched online for transsexual prostitutes even though he listed gay clubs among 30 targets.  (The Sun, March 5th 2018)

There were 47 uses of tranny/trannies – about once a fortnight. Almost all of these use the word in the context of writing about trans people being bullied. However, not all cases appear sympathetic. The Sun, (June 6, 2019) reports that “A DOCTOR Who writer has been dumped by BBC Books for posting the word “trannies”.” The headline of the article “Dr Who’s trans fury” implies that the decision was the result of an angry over-reaction by trans people.

Transgender occurs as a noun four times, while transgenders is used as a plural noun in 33 cases.

How about One Guy, A Girl, A Transgender and Two Nonbinary Persons (Sun)

Caitlyn Jenner is dating a transgender […]

“I believe Karen is not a transgender, I believe she is more transvestite than transsexual…” Times

To come back and get a chance to race Victoria, as a transgender, is a thing I never felt would happen.

Trans(gender) people are regularly written about as quick to take offence or as causing offence to others. The words occur 308 times with transgender and 278 times with trans (in a window of 5 words either side). In 2012, these words only occurred 8 times with transgender/trans.


Scout leaders have been told to avoid referring to children as boys and girls to ensure transgender members are not offended. (Mail on Sunday)

Stubble trouble: Clinic “sorry” after transgender nurse sent to give a smear test (Daily Mail, January 1, 2018)

CategoryTerm2012 (%)2017-18 (%)
Offense wordstransgender6/345 (1.73%308/9305 (3.31%)
trans2/72 (2.77%)278/8545 (3.25%)
Sex wordstransgender0/345 (0%)28/9305 (0.30%)
trans0/72 (0%)22/8545 (0.25%)
transsexual4/233 (1.71%)7/223 (3.13%)
Crime wordstransgender3/345 (0.86%)415/9305 (4.45%)
trans0/72 (0%)193/8545 (2.25%)
Conflict wordstransgender4/345 (1.15%)195/9305 (2.09%)
trans 1/72 (1.38%)139/8545 (1.62%)

Similarly, trans/transgender people are written about in relation to conflict words 608 times in 2018-19, compared to only 5 times in 2012.

A transgender woman is demanding an apology and £2,500 compensation after claiming she was called “sir” by rail company staff. (Times, March 16, 2019)

EVERY member of a local Labour Party executive committee has quit in support of a colleague who was allegedly bullied by a transgender rights campaigner. (Daily Mail, November 16, 2017)

Journalists from the rightwing press were scrabbling to hit a double-whammy: discrediting Labour while tearing apart an outspoken transgender activist. (I, March 7, 2018)

As the police have become embroiled in yet another social media battle over who said what about whom, I fear even the grammar Nazis are no match for the militant transgender brigade as it rides roughshod over common sense. (Telegraph, March 22, 2019)

Trans/transgender people are linked to crime words 608 times in 2018-19, compared to 3 times in 2012.

It’s crazy to give trans prisoners everything they say they want,’ said chair Janice Williams. Why wouldn’t they lie in the circumstances? (Daily Mail)

Women’s jail holds trans lag born lad (The Sun, September 13, 2019)

Some of the trans brigade advocate the murder of Terfs as the best course. (Telegraph, 12 January 2019)

Offense words

affront/affronted/anger/angry/argue/argument/argued/arguing/backlash/clash/clashed/clashing/complain/complained/complaint/complaints/complaining/criticised/criticise/criticising/critical/dispute/fury/furious/offence/offend/offended/offending/outrage/outraged/row/spat/trouble/upset/upsetting/wrath also uproar

Conflict words


Sex words


Crime words


Comparing 2012 to 2018/19

Term20122018-19X times as frequent in 2018-19


Words statistically significantly more frequent in 2012 compared to 2018/19

transsexual, he, transvestite, pass, him, man, clothes, hair, transsexuals, shoes, sperm, breasts, bondage, boy, operations, implants, girl, transvestites, dress, dressing, vasectomy, wear, breast, charity, homosexual, prostitutes, transgendered, dressed, wearing, ladyboys, implant, tranny, injections, corset, Beaumont

Words statistically significantly more frequent in 2018/19 compared to 2012

trans, gender, women, LGBT, LGBTQ, identity, queer, hate, discrimination, violence, transition, transphobic, inclusive, recognition, activist, feminists, Mermaids, neutral, pronouns, harassment, attack, abuse, identifying, female, transphobia, toilets, diverse, testosterone, cis, transitioning, biological, backlash, transitioned, pronoun, inclusion, fluidity, bigotry

Abuse hate, discrimination, violence, transphobic, harassment, attack, abuse, transphobia, backlash, bigotry
Appearancepass, clothing, hair, shoes, dress, dressing, wear, dressed, wearing, corset 
Identity labelsman, transsexual, transvestite, transsexuals, boy, girl, transvestites, homosexual, prostitutes, transgendered, ladyboys, trannytrans, women, queer, LGBT, LGBTQ, identity, cis, fluidity
Pronounshe, himpronoun, pronouns, neutral
proceduresoperations, implants, vasectomy, implant, injections 
inclusivity inclusive, recognition, inclusion, diverse
transition transition, transitioning, transitioned
biology and bodysperm, breastsbiological, testosterone
groupsBeaumont, charityMermaids, activists, feminist

Keywords just for The Mail

Key in 2012: transvestite, GID, brigade, transsexual, bathroom, passing

Key in 2018/19: transgender, women, trans, gender, hate, female, identity, activists, men, LGBT, issues, feminists, feminism, crimes, violence, binary, transphobic, neutral, army

References to transphobia and discrimination suffered by trans people, transitioning, inclusivity and gender-neutral pronouns were much more frequent in 2018-9. Topics that now take up less space in the overall debate involve references to transsexuals, transvestites, trannys and ladyboys as well as discussion of sex-changes, implants, the clothing worn by trans people and their ability to “pass” as a particular gender. But frequency of references to references to cross-dressing and people being intersex have increased. 

Focus on transphobia

References to transphobia are 112 times as frequent in 2018-9 as they were in 2012. This shows one of the most salient changes in the way that trans people are written about as newsworthy.

Transphob* total= 902 word in double quotes=107, in single quotes=25 15% of references to the word transphobia and related words like transphobic occur with distancing quotes around them:

A transgender teenager who demanded the removal of a female Labour member from her post as women’s officer over her allegedly “transphobic” views has been elected to the post in her local Labour party. (The Times, November 20, 2017)

IT’S JK TROLLING; Fan backlash at ‘transphobic’ tweet. (The Sun, March 24 2018)

Analysis of 100 random cases of transphobe*

Transphobia quoted as happening/existing, article uses distancing techniquesHe took to Twitter, and there was a “pile on”, with Topshop being attacked online for its supposed bigotry and “transphobia”.36
Transphobia quoted as happening/existing, article doesn’t use distancing techniquesShe adds: “If Theresa May has this ambition to eradicate homophobic and transphobic bullying and to make sure that LGBT issues are taught well then, as a society, we need to make sure that it’s safe for LGBT people to be able to teach in schools.”15
Transphobia described as happening/existing directly by voice of writerNSW Greens apologise for publishing transphobic article;17
Transphobia described as a bad thingLondon Mayor Sadiq Khan added: “Transphobia is never acceptable.”14
Investigation of transphobia claim newsworthy because it is criticised as unreasonableA police commissioner from Humberside has defended his officers for investigating a man who “liked” a transphobic post on Twitter.1
Person quoted as saying that they are not transphobic, despite being called transphobic“It is not a transphobic thing – there needs to be a fair and level playing field.”2
Article questions whether something is transphobic or notIs this a transphobic insult? Or just another difficulty to be finessed?2
How to deal with transphobia?It doesn’t address transphobia in society or how we can move on from discrimination.1
Term appears in organisation nameTheir names were added to a secret blacklist by a group called Labour Against Transphobia, whose members include Wes Streeting MP.1
Author of piece claims/implies something is not transphobic or that to call someone “transphobic” is wrong.Legitimate objections from women have been howled down as transphobic8
Someone quoted as saying something is not transphobic“…the issues they are raising are not motivated by transphobia but by a concern, sincerely felt, that space hard won by women down the generations will be compromised.”3

Approximately half (47%) of references to transphobia in the press raise questions about its validity. This is done in a range of ways – from use of distancing quotes around transphobia, referring to “supposed” or “alleged” transphobia, referring to the way that the accusers behave: e.g. “howled down as transphobia” or simply baldly stating that something is not transphobia.              

A common set of words linked to transphob* are those involved in news stories where someone claims that someone else is transphobic: accused (62), accusations (24), allegations 11), branded (14), call (6), called (14), claim (5), claims (6), deemed (10), demonising (5), labelled (15) = 172 cases. Alternatively, words that relate to countering transphobia are challenge (6), tackle (7) = 13 cases. When the press write about transphobia it tends to be framed as “it is newsworthy that x calls y transphobic” as opposed to “transphobia is a problem that needs to be tackled”.


There are 4599 references to children in the 2018-19 corpus (0.07% of all words) and 530 references in the 2012 corpus (0.08% of all words). While the frequency has increased over time – the word occurred 4 times as much in the latter period, the amount of discussion as a proportion of the overall debate has stayed similar.

The phrase “children as young as [2-12]” occurs 83 times in the corpus. It always signifies moral disapproval of the way that children are being treated.

NURSERY school toddlers are getting lessons from drag queens to teach them about “gender fluidity”. Children as young as two are taught specially adapted songs by performers including Donna La Mode (The Sun, November 13, 2017)

CHILDREN as young as three could be helped to change gender by doctors on the basis of just a Skype phone call under plans being considered by the NHS. (Mail On Sunday, August 25, 2019)

Books given to children as young as four include stories about a boy who wants to wear a dress and one about a red crayon that discovers it is really blue. (Mail on Sunday, April 21, 2019)

Two drag acts hosted readings yesterday designed to show children as young as five that it’s OK to be different’. (Daily Mail, June 1, 2019)

Other footage featured children as young as seven questioning their gender. (The Sun, March 21, 2018)

The broadcaster has been accused of sowing confusion in classroom materials to be shown to children as young as nine (Sunday Times, September 8, 2019)

Children as young as 10 are having their gender switched by deed poll as record numbers of British youngsters identify as transgender. (Sunday Times, January 13, 2019)

CHILDREN as young as 11 are being given hormone treatment to suppress early puberty (The Sun, January 22, 2018)

Children as young as 12 should have the legal right to change their gender on their birth certificates, Scotland’s commissioner for young people has said. (The Times, May 29, 2018)

Children as young as 13 are being railroaded into changing gender by overzealous NHS therapists who parents fear are misdiagnosing their young patients. (Mail on Sunday, October 29, 2017)

There are 236 references to trans(gender) children in the 2018-19 corpus (in comparison this term only occurs 5 times in 2012). The term is most common in the Times, Guardian and Mail which collectively account for 62% of cases.

trans(gender) childrenExpGuardi/IndMailMirrorObsSunTelTimTotal

Unlike, transphobia, the term does not occur in scare quotes, suggesting that there is greater acceptance of the term.

An analysis of 100 random cases of trans(gender) children found 56 cases that accepted the existence of trans children and/or advocated that they should receive support. Thirty seven cases were more disapproving, either suggesting that children who identify as trans should not be supported in transitioning or that efforts to support them (e.g. through pronoun stickers or gender-neutral toilets) are unnecessary, even unhelpful. A further seven cases appear more neutral, noting that this is an issue which divides people but not clearly coming down on either side.

Trans childrenExample 
Help, visibility for transgender children is good/neededThe increase in cases has led to calls for a dedicate unit for transgender children32
Help for transgender children reported but article distances from itThe Boy Scouts of America announced that it would allow transgender children who think they are boys to enrol in its boys-only programmes.16
There is a moral panic about trans childrenThey haven’t talked to young people and the parents are sourced from gender-critical websites, who do not believe that trans children exist,” she said.6
Trans children existSome will identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual or trans16
Questions whether there are as many trans children as claimedSuper-liberal Charlize Theron is parroting the acceptable line on trans children16
Not everyone agreesShe also cites a discussion between professors Robert Winston and Gary Butler on transgender children as an example of a nuanced discussion.7
Reports transphobic views of someoneShe added that she was not anti-transgender, although she had previously described government plans to extend a new gender identity law to transgender children as “twisted”.2

The following analysis examines two articles (from the Sun and Sunday Times) both of which ostensibly present a “balanced” perspective.



A CHARITY that helps transgender children and their families will get a £500,000 lottery grant after a review of the funding.

The cheque to Mermaids had been paused after critics claimed the group encouraged kids to transition against scientific evidence and standards.

Yesterday the National Lottery Community Fund revealed it will pay out after rejecting all the allegations. In a statement it said: “We undertook a review of a number of concerns expressed.

“This review did not find any grounds to withhold funding from Mermaids UK. The grant has therefore been approved.”

The money will be paid over five years. A backlash began last December, with Father Ted creator Graham Linehan among the critics. He called the idea of more clinics “terrifying”.

Tory MP David Davies said: “I am absolutely horrified the Big Lottery Fund are handing out a fortune to this aggressive organisation.”

Yesterday trans campaigner Paris Lees praised the go-ahead: tweeting: “@Mermaids_Gender save lives.” Its chief exec Susie Green said: “We will be able do more to improve outcomes and experiences for transgender and gender-diverse young people.”

This article (The Sun, February 20, 2019) does not directly appear to approve or disapprove of the decision to award half a million pounds of Lottery money to the charity Mermaids. Instead, the article is about a funding decision that is framed as controversial. This is fairly typical of press reporting on trans people and issues, with repeated use of terms like row, spat and trouble. The effect of such reporting is that readers become primed to think of trans people as associated with controversy, as opposed to other ways of framing stories about trans people such as them facing abuse or helping others. The headline puts quotes around the words £500K OK – it is unlikely that this is not a direct quote from the Lottery funders, and there are multiple readings of what these two words could mean. It could be descriptive: “The OK is given to the decision to award £500K” or it could signal that the Sun approves of the decision e.g. “The £500K award is OK”. However, the use of quotes could indicate the Sun wishes to distance itself from the decision, attributing the approval of the money to the National Lottery group.

The article appears balanced in that it quotes from six people or groups, three who are “for” and three who are “against” the decision. The quotes from the critics are couched in strong language: “terrifying”, “horrified”, “aggressive organisation” and the critics represent voices that readers of the Sun are more likely to identify with or agree with – an actor in a popular tv sitcom and a Tory MP. The supporters of the funding include a little-known trans activist (the article does not interview her but reports one of her tweets), the chief exec of the group who received the funding and the funder itself. These voices could be viewed as having “vested interests” (e.g. Susie Green benefits from the money while The Lottery Community Fund desire to be seen as making the right decision). The article foregrounds (placing it in the second sentence) the argument that the group encourage kids to transition which goes against scientific evidence and standards. This is a point which is not elaborated upon but as it stands, it seems hard to counter, offering a strong legitimation of this point of view.

The article implies that there are numerous critics of the decision – with use of unspecified plural terms like critics (used twice) and “all the allegations” which implies there were many allegations against Mermaids, as well as the non-count noun “backlash”. Two of the supportive perspectives appear at the end of the article, implying they are given less precedence than other views.

Talks ‘make children feel surgery is expected’

For Mermaids, residential weekends are at the heart of its work – two days, three or four times a year, where trans children and their parents can get together to socialise, swap tips and feel less alone.

Other attractions, however, included young people showing off their mastectomy scars and a “talk about bottom [genital] surgery”, which some participants thought made children “feel that it is expected of them”.

There were also regular drink problems. Minutes of a Mermaids trustee board meeting in July 2016 say “there had been incidents at every recent residential that were alcohol-related … Some trustees felt strongly that children were being put at risk.”

One Mermaids volunteer, the minutes said, had “woken people at 2.45am returning to the bedroom after clearly being drinking”.

The group’s response for its next weekend, in Watford that autumn, was a total alcohol ban, with everyone handed a card telling them how to behave.

That, too, caused problems. “It felt patronising and insulting … way over the top,” said one parent in the feedback report. As another put it: “Please treat the adults like adults … the blanket ban on alcohol makes Mermaids feel like a puritanical cult.”

There were plenty of positive comments too. “A marvellous, unique opportunity for our children to relax and just be,” said one couple.

Another enthused: “Huge respect to the guys who showed us (upon request) their top surgery [mastectomy] scars … saved a lot of dodgy Google searches.”

However, another person did ask: “When the boys do the talk about bottom surgery, is it possible to have someone who has decided against it, so that the children don’t feel that it is expected of them?” Helen Webberley, a private Welsh GP who gave sex-change hormones to a 12-year-old, was the star of the Watford show. “She is just phenomenal – thank God for people like her on our side,” said one parent.

Webberley has since been suspended on an interim basis by the General Medical Council, pending the outcome of an investigation, and convicted of running an unlicensed gender clinic, facts that did not initially stop Mermaids continuing to recommend her.

This article (The Sunday Times, June 16, 2019) describes residential weekends hosted by Mermaids. The articles quotes from a range of opinions about the events, although the headline foregrounds the most negative one: “Talks ‘make children feel surgery is expected’”. This point occurs three times in the 364-word article, appearing in the headline and twice in the main body of the article.

The article somewhat glibly refers to the “attractions” on offer at the events, which are described as “showing off their mastectomy scars and a “talk about bottom [genital] surgery”. The word “attractions” calls to mind a trip to a theme park or fairground, implicitly positioning the people who possess scars as entertaining exhibits.

The article then presents criticisms both of a member of staff who had been drinking alcohol and of the response by Mermaids to ban alcohol – the term “puritanical cult” is used, describing the group in very negative terms. While the GP Helen Webberly is reported as receiving positive feedback, the article ends by noting she has been suspended and convicted of running an unlicensed gender clinic, and that Mermaids continued to recommend her.

While the article notes two positive comments, overall it signals disapproval of the events, due to the choice of headline and repetitions of the point about surgery being made to feel expected.

The analysis around trans(gender) children indicates something of a dilemma for some elements of the UK press. Children are a vulnerable group and the press do not want to be seen as attacking or doubting them. Yet some journalists do not like the idea of children identifying as trans. Instead, an easier target are parents, adult trans people or groups who seek to support such children. 

The unnamed woman said: “They are being brainwashed into believing they are transgender.” (The Sun, November 19, 2018)

It comes as some parents fear social media stars are brainwashing kids’ with pro-trans propaganda. (The Sun, October 30, 2017)

MPs and parents claimed the question was intrusive and could confuse children, amid growing concerns in some quarters over the inclusion of transgender issues in primary schools. (Telegraph, December 11, 2017)

Last night the document was met with criticism from campaigners who warned the inclusion of trans issues in the curriculum could confuse and upset’ children. (Daily Mail, December 13, 2017)

But, for sanity’s sake, can’t we at least agree to leave impressionable children alone and stop spreading the idea that gender is just another of life’s choices, like whether to start with whitebait or soup? (Daily Mail, February 22, 2019)

Other vulnerable children being referred to Britain’s only NHS gender clinic for under-18s include those with mental health problems, she claimed. (Daily Mail, October 6, 2019)


There are 355 mentions of this group in the corpus with one newspaper, The Times having 56% of all mentions, and the Guardian and Mail accounting for 29% of mentions between them.


The majority of mentions of Mermaids are negative. It is represented as incompetent, unscientific, blackmailing,

Mermaids are well intentioned but in this instance they are doing more damage than good. (Mail, February 24, 2018)

The report said Gids had tried to “placate” lobby groups such as the Mermaids charity, which campaigns for children to be given sexchange treatment. (Sunday Times, February 24, 2019)

Moral highgrounders tend to casually imperil others, not themselves. And what better example of the breed’s dangerous mix of thoughtlessness, arrogance and defiance could there be than Mermaids’ accidental leakage of confidential data? (Telegraph, June 18, 2019)

That Mermaids narrative is everywhere [within the service]” one former clinician claimed. (The Times, April 8, 2019)

The news was quickly met by anger by some campaigners, with The Times’ Janice Turner accusing Mermaids of spreading “cod science”. (The Guardian, February 19, 2019)

Stephanie Davies-Arai, of the parents’ group Transgender Trend, accused Mermaids of blackmailing parents and said: “Funding this agenda will lead to more young people who regret such lifechanging harms to their bodies.” (Sunday Times, December 16,2018)

Mermaids is delighted to have a limited number of places in the 2020 Great North Run. As a #TeamMermaids runner Mermaids will cover the cost of your entry fee and provide you with a Mermaids running vest. In return, we ask that you raise a minimum of £350 sponsorship for the charity Please be aware that the charity is unable to cover any other costs incurred such as travel to and from the race, so please consider this before applying.  

About the Great North Run:

The Great North Run is the largest half marathon in the world, taking place annually in North East England each September. Participants run between Newcastle upon Tyne and South Shields. The run was devised by former Olympic 10,000 m bronze medallist and BBC Sport commentator Brendan Foster.  The 2020 race will be held on Sunday 13th September and promises to be another popular event with a great atmosphere. For further details on the race please see the Great Run website at:
 To register your interest please contact Mermaids Fundraising Manager, Rosanna Andrews, on [email protected]

Recently, we’ve tried very hard to step away from the most degrading examples of anti-trans rhetoric in the national press and focus on the positive. Today, in the middle of what might feel like nothing short of an orchestrated onslaught, we feel we have no choice.

We cannot stand silent amidst a slew of misleading stories, seemingly designed to undermine, frighten, alienate and demonise a vulnerable minority, including children. We have been approached for comment by all of the journalists responsible and it has been depressing, trying to offer fact-based, reasonable information. In truth, while a small number are simply too busy, too inexperienced, too lazy or too incompetent to question the motives of small but noisy groups seeking to spread fear and division, the truth is that some are only too happy to vilify transgender and non-binary kids and adults. So, after a short period of very positive coverage of transgender issues, we face the inevitable attempt to force us all back to the all-too-familiar tropes.

Let’s start with a story on Sky News (we won’t link to such stories, to prevent unnecessary traffic) about a new group, seeking to support mainly women and girls seeking to ‘detransition’. We were approached for comment during the week with the assumption that we would be opposed to anyone supporting people who do so. We explained, as we have explained before, that we support anyone following their own path and simply try to help people to feel empowered and safe. We sent a link to this blog post. We also suggested the journalist consider the wealth of research showing that ‘detransition’ rates are very low: less than 1% in a number of international studies, including this report, which found of 3,398 trans patients who’d accessed NHS support, 16 expressed regret, and only 3 made a long-term detransition.

Still, regret following any surgery is commonplace but – according to a number of international studies – regret for post-operative gender-transition patients is far lower than for other forms of ‘plastic surgery’.

This doesn’t mean we ‘advocate’ any particular route for young transgender or ‘enby’ (we like that contraction and hope you do too) service users. Nor do we belittle or abandon those few who regret. Our ethos is only ever to support people in their own choices. We also suggested the Sky journalist might wish to question the claim that ‘hundreds’ of people were approaching this new group for help. If so, then that’s an important piece of date very much worthy of discussion.

Any group supporting young people in their journey is welcome, so long as it isn’t a trojan horse for anti-transgender rhetoric.

The Daily Mail has a story suggesting that cisgender girls are afraid to use the toilets at school because transgender and non-binary students are using them and this is causing pupils to risk their health.

Newspapers are quick to base articles on hearsay and unsubstantiated anecdotal claims made by a tiny minority. Why? Because fear and prejudice sells papers and gets clicks, and because a number of journalists personally believe that trans people (particularly trans women/girls) are a threat or are deserving of ridicule. The article claims cisgender girls are afraid to use the toilets.

Our experience shows that it is transgender and non-binary students who are afraid to use the toilets at school. It is our young service users who speak very emotionally about years spent trying to hold on before using facilities, risking their health. It is they who face daily verbal and physical assaults. We find no proof of transgender students causing cis’ female classmate distress in school toilets while they are menstruating. We know of no figures suggesting trans or enby kids are a threat in school facilities at all.

We do know that our service users are being regularly demonised in the national press by a small number of people who seem intent on ruthlessly attacking defenceless children and encouraging their cis’ classmates to mock, isolate and ridicule them. We say: shame on you. The newspapers, the journalists and the “equality campaigners”, who seem determined to injure and cow every transgender person in the country, regardless of their age or vulnerability. As we wait for an IPSO review of reporting on transgender issues over the last decade, we ask for nothing more from our press than equality of coverage on this vital and complex issue. Not to be approached at the 11th hour for a one-line comment at the end of a 1,000-word article founded on rumour, prejudice and division. Not to answer to factual inaccuracies. Not to be equated to groups fuelled by hate. We beg journos to spend 5 minutes looking into their sources, asking objectively what their motives & who their backers might be. We ask them to read scientific papers and look at respected international studies. We ask them to meet our service users to help them understand.  Things are getting better. More and more, people are standing behind LGBTQ+ causes and newspapers are beginning to offer space to real people with real stories. That is precisely why this latest wave of negative coverage has come our way. In a way, it’s a good sign. Still, we cannot ignore the fact that some politicians are also doubtful of the need to support transgender people. According to reports today, Minister for Women and Equalities, Liz Truss MP, will deny trans adults the long-awaited freedom to self ID. We know many of those at the Equalities Office will be dismayed and we sincerely hope this is not an accurate report. We are yet to engage with Liz Truss and would be pleased to do so. On this somewhat dismal day in the newspapers, let us end on a positive note. We stand strong with our fellow charities and organisations: Stonewall, Gendered Intelligence, AllSorts, The Albert Kennedy Trust, All About Trans, Pinks News, Gay TImes and many more.  We promise those who feel afraid this weekend that we will not abandon you. We will not let you be silenced. We will not let you be demonised. We will keep fighting for your rights and for the truth. One day, we will look back on these stories spreading fear and division and we will wonder how we kept going. And the answer will be: because we always do. And because we have hope.  As we approach our 25th anniversary, we look at what we’ve achieved and only wish this blog post and twitter thread weren’t still necessary. But they are more necessary than ever. So let’s keep going. Please share this post and the Twitter thread and make ourselves heard.

An open letter from Mermaids on World Suicide Prevention Day

10th September 2019

Change now to save transgender children from suicide

Mermaids has been supporting transgender children and young people for nearly 25 years. We know that there is nothing more devastating than the loss of a child or young person to suicide. We see, first hand, the terrible psychological trauma suffered by some of our service users because they live in a society that seems unable or unwilling to understand and accept them.

Overall, the number of suicides in the UK fell between 2017-2018 but the number of under 19’s taking their own lives in that period rose by 15%.(1) Meanwhile, research from the charity Stonewall shows that nearly half of young trans people have attempted suicide.(2)

On World Suicide Prevention Day 2019, we’re sending the positive message that simple, easy changes to the way we speak about and treat transgender people can prevent children and teenagers from suicidal thoughts.

Many people don’t realise how powerful it can be to show simple acts of respect.

Studies show that, just by using a transgender person’s correct name and pronouns, their anxiety, depression and suicidal thoughts reduce to almost the same as their cisgender counterparts.(3)

We know that by failing to support trans children and young people, we are losing them to suicide.

Teachers, doctors and the police have a duty to care for the health, happiness and safety of trans young people and their families, as they do for everyone. If they don’t act on this duty, many more transgender people will face some of the causes of suicidal thoughts, such as anxiety, exclusion, depression, bullying, substance abuse, self-harm and homelessness. We’re calling for all teachers, doctors and police officers in the UK to be given obligatory training in gender diversity.

Today, we’re renewing our call for the Government to recognise transgender children’s rights, whether they’re girls, boys or non-binary. For too long, our politicians have presided over a damaging, obstructive and distressing legal framework and health system. For the happiness and safety of our service users, we call for affirmative care to be a requirement in both guidance and law. It is nothing short of a national scandal that the current system is leading smart, talented, creative, motivated, kind and loved young people to consider ending their lives. It is time the Gender Recognition Act 2004 was changed to allow transgender people of all ages to self-identify.

We are at the forefront of one of the greatest civil rights challenges of our time. Young transgender people are losing their lives. Our society must stop failing them.

FOR MEDIA ENQUIRIES/REQUESTS, EMAIL [email protected] CALL: 07727699302

ONS (Office for National Statistics) found overall decrease in number of suicides in the general population between 2017-2018 but also a 15% increase in under 19’s taking their own lives:

2017 Stonewall School Report found that 45% of trans young people at some point have attempted suicide, see pp. 31 :

A survey carried out for NHS Digital by NatCen Social Research and the Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester found that 9% of the population aged 16-25 is estimated to have attempted suicide in their lifetime, see pp. 302:

Study: “Chosen Name Use Is Linked to Reduced Depressive Symptoms, Suicidal Ideation, and Suicidal Behavior Among Transgender Youth“, J Adolesc Health. 2018 Oct;63(4):503-505. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Mar 30.

This study aimed to examine the relation between chosen name use, as a proxy for youths’ gender affirmation in
various contexts, and mental health among transgender youth.

Data come from a community cohort sample of 129 transgender and gender nonconforming youth from three U.S.
cities. We assessed chosen name use across multiple contexts and examined its association with depression, suicidal
ideation, and suicidal behavior.

After adjusting for personal characteristics and social support, chosen name use in more contexts was associated
with lower depression, suicidal ideation, and suicidal behavior. Depression, suicidal ideation, and suicidal behavior
were lowest when chosen names could be used in all four contexts.

For transgender youth who choose a name different from the one given at birth, use of their chosen name in
multiple contexts affirms their gender identity and reduces mental health risks known to be high in this group.

Today we received support from international actress, model and human rights campaigner, Jameela Jamil. She posted a heartfelt video on her Instagram and already the video has had a massive response with positive comments flooding in!

It comes after other worldwide names gave their support to our charity.

Harry and Megan have shown their support for us, calling the work we do “Amazing”

A spokesman for the Royal Foundation said: “Mermaids are one of a number of important organisations who are working on the frontline to support the mental health and wellbeing of young people in Britain.”

You can read more about this here!

HBomberGuy, a prominent YouTuber, raised over a quarter of a million pounds for us by streaming Donkey Kong for nearly 58 hours! He has this to say about why he supports us

“I chose to support [Mermaids] because as a person living in Britain, I find the media discussion around this issue to be woefully misinformed, and I’d like to do my bit to help support the people who do the hard work of contributing to people’s thinking on an issue,”

Over the course of the two and a half day stream, both Cher and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez took to twitter to give their support as well!

You can find out more about HBomberGuy’s charity stream here!

Emma Watson also tweeted her support for trans kids last year and became flooded with fan art from overjoyed children and teenagers

But you don’t have to be a celebrity to show your support. Every day, our supporters help keep our work going by donating right here!

Susie Green, CEO of Mermaids said:
‘While we are supportive of the Scottish Government’s plans to simplify the process of getting a Gender Recognition Certificate, we are extremely disappointed to find that recognition for under 18s and non-binary people is not intended to be included in the bill promised to be published by the end of this year. 

‘It seems a contradiction for a government to respect the ability of 16- and 17-year-olds to vote, while restricting their right to express who they are.’

‘We are also dismayed at the continuing lack of recognition for non-binary people who are perpetually overlooked and unrepresented at a government level.

‘The proposal to replace the current outdated, intrusive and medicalised process under the current Gender Recognition Act is intended to move towards a world where transgender people are respected. We support this move and applaud First Minister and SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon in her staunch support for transgender rights. 

‘However, when delivered, the new system must demonstrate that the Scottish Government recognises trans people for who they are at all ages, without imposing a system that bars many from identifying as their true gender identity.

‘Though it seems there is no appetite in Holyrood for improving the GRA for children, teenagers and non-binary people, we must consider this process a stepping stone towards true freedom and equality for the transgender community as a whole and we urge the Scottish Parliament to press ahead with true change and lead the rest of the UK as the home of compassionate legislative reform.

It’s now more important than ever for the recently announced second round of public consultation to avoid delaying legislative progress. We hope it will focus instead on creating a system of true self-determination for transgender people in Scotland, in the hope that we can then begin a calm and rational assessment of the situation regarding under 18s and non-binary people.

In her announcement to the Scottish Parliament, Social Security Secretary, Shirley Anne Sommerville said she was “acutely aware of how divided opinion is”. We accept that we are in the midst of a passionate discussion around gender in modern society but while the debate can often seem divided, those working to improve the lives of transgender children, young people and adults must remain united in their determination to work towards a truly free tomorrow, unshackled by laws which undermine transgender people’s basic right to say in law: “I am who I am”.

The Royal College of GP’s has put out a new position statement on trans healthcare so we asked our Policy and Engagement Officer, Natasha Handley to take a look at it. 

Hello everyone. Natasha here, the Policy and Engagement Officer for Mermaids!

Today a really important document was published by the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) regarding the role of GPs and how they care for gender-questioning and transgender patients.

The first half of this new document is a relatively in-depth summary of the difficulties transgender people face in accessing medical care, and it reflects what many of our service users have been telling us for years: things really need to change and fast.

The statement highlights just how long the waiting lists are at the moment. It states an average of 18 months from GP referral to a first GIC appointment but I know many wait much longer. Compare that to a transgender person’s constitutional right to an initial appointment within 18 weeks and it looks just as awful as it is. That’s not including the average 18 months again until a second assessment.

The statement also talks about how little the situation is changing and how inconsistent (or non-existent) the guidance for primary care providers often is.

In the meantime, trans people have little support except from their GPs and third sector organisations like the team here at Mermaids and a small but amazing group of others which you can find here.

In 2016, the Women and Equalities Committee found “serious deficiencies in the quality and capacity of NHS gender identity services” and expressed concern about “the apparent lack of any concrete plans to address the lack of specialist clinicians in this field.”

At the time, NHS England pledged to reduce the wait to below 18 weeks by 2018.  This hasn’t happened, and right now there are around 7,500 adults still waiting for their first assessment.

Any young people waiting for an appointment at GIDS will know how desperate the demand for more services is. We can all agree with this document’s conclusion that ‘there is an urgent need to increase the capacity of gender identity specialists and clinics and expand the understanding of gender variance issues across the entire health system.’

Whilst the waiting lists are so long, a supportive GP can be crucial to the health and wellbeing of trans people of all ages. However, as this document states: “the UK lacks a nationally recognised training programme for gender identity health care” and “GPs often lack a deeper understanding of trans identities, gender dysphoria, referral pathways into gender identity services, and their own role in prescribing hormone treatment.”

This has led to cases where appropriate care has not been provided. We know from our service users that one of the biggest barriers to accessing care is the lack of knowledge and awareness in GP surgeries

The RCGP also talks here about the specific issues surrounding trans young people:

“GPs face even greater challenges in addressing the needs of children and young people under the age of 16 who are experiencing gender dysphoria or are in the process of transitioning to another gender. These challenges include the vulnerabilities of young people at this time and the heightened risk of self-harm and attempted suicide, the concerns of parents who may not be accepting of what is happening to their child and the lack of a robust evidence base for interventions. Parental and carer involvement in the care of these patients is crucial and adds another layer complexity to the GPs role.”

In response to all these points, the RCGP make some excellent UK-wide policy recommendations and initiatives, which are urgently needed. Let’s take a look:

    iv.         We strongly encourage the NHS to consider the expansion of gender identity services in the Devolved Nations and for gender-questioning children as well, to address the increasing demand and pressure on the Tavistock and Portman clinic which is currently the only GIC treating children and young people in England, Scotland and Wales.

     v.         The NHS should urgently address the extensive waiting lists for GICs across the country and ensure the commissioning of gender identity services is sufficient to support the level and spread demand for specialist advice from patients and GPs.

    vi.         Up-to-date IT systems and associated IT training is needed to enable GPs and other healthcare professionals to treat trans patients and patients with gender dysphoria in a safe and respectful manner (for example, documenting generalist and specialist advice in writing as part of the patient record, maintaining safe access to screening programmes such as smears after a patient’s gender has been changed on records). NHS systems should record codes for biological sex as well as gender identity, while ensuring all patients are afforded the right to express their preferences for how they wish to be named and referred to by their GP and other healthcare professionals.

So what can we make of these recommendations? The issues with the waiting lists were planned to be fixed by 2018. In 2019, they are not getting any shorter and demand is only increasing, leaving thousands of trans people without the support they desperately need. Tackling these waiting lists needs to be a priority, as well as ensuring that GPs have adequate tools and training to care for their trans and gender-nonconforming patients.

RCGP is also leading the way by developing an e-Learning module to help GPs understand the needs of their trans and non-binary patients which will cover a huge range of topics; everything from ways to make their patients more comfortable with them to the risks and benefits of prescribing.

Other educational and training bodies are encouraged to provide their own training programmes and materials to support GPs and their team is engaging with trans people and this is definitely something Mermaids will be working on in the near future. We will fully support any other organisation who would like to do the same.

I ought to say here that TransLeeds has a guide for GPs already and It’s pretty good in my opinion. I wrote it!

This document from the RCGP is warmly welcomed. It expresses the concerns of trans people and their families who are currently navigating the system and sends a clear message to policy makers that these issues need to be addressed. However, I think it really needs to be emphasised just how important a supportive GP is.

When I was first referred to the Gender Identity Service, the waiting list for initial assessment was four years long. Imagine struggling with your gender identity for so long before finally having the courage to go to your GP to ask for help, only to find out it will be another 4 or 5 years before you will have access to treatment. I was incredibly lucky to have a supportive GP who helped me access an HRT bridging prescription three years before I received my diagnosis of Gender Dysphoria. I cannot tell you how important that prescription was to me. I could finally go out and live my life and have been doing everything I can to support my peers since then. Without it, I might still be a recluse and wouldn’t have met or worked with all the amazing people I call my friends.

Having a supportive GP shouldn’t be a lottery, and hopefully with the Royal College of General Practitioner’s help everyone will have access to care they need.

This year, for Volunteer’s Week, we’ve asked our amazing volunteers to share what giving up their time for Mermaids means to them! We have a very diverse range of volunteers ranging from LGBT activists, to parents and former service users. Together they work so hard to provide our vital services, such as the helpline and forums, to everyone who needs them. If you’d like to become a volunteer for Mermaids, click here to find out more!

Our trustees are amazing LGBT rights champions who love to get involved with supporting our service users!

Some of our most dedicated volunteers have themselves been supported by Mermaids and are now giving that same support to others. They are incredible at empathising with our service users’ feelings and understanding what they are going through because they were once in their position.

Many of our volunteers look to promote equality and diversity across all walks of life, to make sure that every child has the opportunity to live their lives to the fullest and be as happy as they can be.

While others work hard to provide the support that they never had access to while growing up.

All of our volunteers work together to provide our services across the country. From the helpline and forums to running support groups and representing us at pride, everyone’s contribution is invaluable to us and appreciated by every single one of us here at Mermaids. So on behalf of all of us to all of our volunteers- “Thank you! We couldn’t do what we do without you!” To find out more about joining our incredible team of volunteers, click here!

You can find out more about volunteer’s week here!

Last week, Phoebe Waller-Bridge revealed in an interview on the American network, NPR that she ‘desperately wanted to be a boy’ when she was younger. Cue the inevitable reaction from certain members of the press. Within hours, articles appeared implying the actress and writer was lucky to have grown up before the days of trans awareness because…well…she would have been forced to take medication and identify as a boy for the rest of her life against her will, right?

One of our young people, Sarah, wanted to explain that, then as now, it’s actually just about exploring who you are and there’s nothing wrong with changing your mind:

Hi everyone! I’m Sarah. I’m 17 and from Wales and I’m trans but working it all out still. Anyway, I read the coverage of what Phoebe Waller-Bridge said. It’s like they’re implying that if she’d been a child exploring her gender today she’d have been forced into something but I’m not sure what.

It sounds like she was able to call herself Alex and shave her head and just be herself at that time so her parents must be pretty cool. Maybe that’s partly why she’s such a good writer and actress now. She got to understand herself so much as a kid.

That’s what Mermaids has done for me: let me be myself and find out who I am in a safe place with support and no judgement or expectations or anything. That’s what Phoebe did. Then she hit puberty and decided she was a girl in the end and guess what…there’s literally nothing wrong with that! I know that if I ended up realising I was non-binary or not trans in a few years then that would be fine too. I mean, Mermaids is just about allowing me to find out who I am now and worry about tomorrow…tomorrow.

Sometimes when I’m reading things in papers and online, it’s like they think children and young people like me are being forced to say we’re trans and to sign some kind of contract to say we’ll always be that way. It’s not like that.

Just like with Phoebe, I’m working myself out and there’s no pressure. My mum and everyone who supports me would be totally cool if I changed my mind about stuff. What matters is that right now I’m a young, trans woman. I’m not a cis male and being able to say that saved my life, really.

Phoebe Waller Bridge was lucky to be allowed to explore her ‘Alex’ side and I’m lucky to be supported but lots of kids don’t have understanding parents like that and it’s really sad and frightening for them.

Some of the reports today make it seem like trans children are being pushed to say they feel a certain way but it’s the opposite. I’m a trans girl because I’m a trans girl. Simple.

If Phoebe Waller-Bridge had been a kid today, maybe she’d have been my friend at Mermaids and there would have been no difference to her journey. She’d have been Alex for a bit and then Phoebe again. She’d have been supported, just like me.

I’m still on my journey but the important thing is, I’m able to be the person I feel I am right now and that makes me feel safe and strong…or stronger anyway!

Thanks Phoebe, for talking so openly.